The chart below shows how frequency people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar graph illustrates how often the American citizens went to fast food stores over a period of 10 years between 2003 and 2013.
Overall, it is clear that most people consumed fast food once a week and once or twice a month over the period surveyed; whereas just a small number of the population had fast food every day.
The percentage of citizens eating fast food daily was only below 5% over the time shown. Then, it was followed by the proportion of those who did not eat fast food, at 5% in 2005 and nearly 4.5% in both 2010 and 2013. The figure of people just ate fast food a few times a year was followed by that of those consumed several times per year, at around 12.5% to 15% and 16% to 20% respectively.
Meanwhile, the percentage of people who ate fast food once a week in 2016 was as high as the figure for those consuming the food once or twice a month in 2003, at nearly 36%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | dhillonsukh | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | sspriing | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 84
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 72
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... over the period surveyed; whereas just a small number of the population had fast food every day....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 733.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.26162790698 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17465954392 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.2077169571 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279045932981 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151410682104 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319215037939 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179461120148 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206216401786 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.02 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.