This bar chart indicates how often people ate fast food in 2003, 2006, and 2013 in USA.
Each year's distribution ratio is similar. In every year, over 95 percent people ate fast food at least once a year. It takes about 3 to 4 percentage who ate fast food in every day. Most people consume fast food once a week or once or twice a month. In 2003 and 2006, people proportion who eat junk food at least once a week just over half. In the year 2006, ratio of once a week record highest figure, and 2013, once or twice a month is highest. Comparing with the year 2003, 2006 with 2013, proportions reduce in item Every day, Several times a week, Once a week. By this chart, it seems people consumed junk food most in 2006, less in 2003, least in 2013. At a result, in 2013, frequency of eating at fast food restaurant is lower than past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
... 2003, 2006, and 2013 in USA. Each years distribution ratio is similar. In every...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in everyday'?
Suggestion: in everyday
...out 3 to 4 percentage who ate fast food in every day. Most people consume fast food once a w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 676.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.225 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07906228863 2.65546596893 78% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.8173004974 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.6 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338648228786 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15900699417 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127415881562 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366623229771 0.15604864568 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110156009484 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.9 11.4140731707 60% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.