Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
It cannot be denied that information is power in 21st Century. According this trend, the issue of sharing information is increasing. Some people say that as sharing much information, world become better. Others say that some information should be protected from sharing. I agree with this opinion.
There are three reasons for sharing information. First, human beings have gone up stairs by using group intelligent. For example sharing method of making fire, or making houses. Sharing information is a perfect way for improving our life. Also, if we do not share result of research, other people can study subject which is same with yours and this can lead wasting of time and money. Finally, sharing information can improve public's life. For instance, Linux the computer operating system had not been made by one person or one company. Whoever can develop Linux without restriction of anything for example major, academic level, gender or country. By this development policy, people can use Linux for free.
Information is not only power, but also property. Many companies are spending money dramatically for development of their technology. Sometimes bad people employ industrial spy to cheating secret information. So sharing every information for free is quite unfair to companies. Additionally, sometimes restrict knowledge is needed. For example, making weeds or drugs.
In my opinion, sharing information is good surely. However some information should be restricted by law. We should respect people's effort as well as result of that. They have right to protected by government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...on, sharing information is good surely. However some information should be restricted b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40562248996 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78924264239 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.650602409639 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3438547459 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.0833333333 106.682146367 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.375 20.7667163134 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282471402762 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850568150073 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795563143908 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192778091991 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838316319157 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.62 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.