Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Someone said money spent on railways must more than roads, and others said oppositly. In my opinion, investment for improvement of railway is more important. There are three reasons.
First of all, for environment. Everyone know that using public transportation is better for earth environment than using cars. For now, air pollution is a big problem in our society so that government must try to save environment. If they spend much money for extend or repair of roads it would promote people to buy cars and to use cars more than before. People could think that using car is more comfortable than using train and this can lead more air pollution by cars. Governments must not forget they have responsibility for take care of environment.
Second, for tourism. Almost of tourists use train rather than car. If the facility of station is bad or speed of train is so slow, it is hard to expect to they come again. I think especially the country where earn most money by tourism, must improve their railway. Once, I have visited Taiwan with my friends. I was very impressed their public tranportation system. The railway was pretty good, and other facilities like toilet were extremely clean. Cause of such experience me and my friends decided to go there again.
Finally, the third reason that I agree this opinion is for pair. Railway is can used by everyone who paid ticket price though the only car owners can use roads. Even if roads are clean, wide and compotable, people who have no car, cannot have any benefit by that.
In conclusion, I think investment for railway is more important than roads because of environment, tourism, pair. It is not that I claim spend money on road is unnecessary, of course investment for roads is essential, improvement of railway is first.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...First of all, for environment. Everyone know that using public transportation is bet...
^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...by tourism, must improve their railway. Once, I have visited Taiwan with my friends....
^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...ee this opinion is for pair. Railway is can used by everyone who paid ticket price ...
^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'use' or 'be used'?
Suggestion: use; be used
...his opinion is for pair. Railway is can used by everyone who paid ticket price thoug...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, third, i think, in conclusion, of course, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84967320261 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6355028966 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9908302978 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.4545454545 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9090909091 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158569265006 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463031246992 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408664870842 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096247316885 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190019778914 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.