The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

These two pie charts and a table show changing of the satisfaction of visitors and the number of visitors after the Ashdown Museum's refurbishment.

According to the table, the number of visitors were increased about twenty-thousand. This number is almost 20% of 74,000 which is amount of visitors before refurbishment.

The charts of satisfaction is interesting. At the first chart, the proportion of dissatisfied was 40 percent. Moreover, ratio of very dissatisfied was 10 percent. When sum up these two percentage, we can know half of people were disappointed with the museum. People who answered the museum was satisfied just a quarter.

However, after the change of museum the proportion of people who said satisfied and very satisfied was about three quarters. Oppositely, dissatisfied and very dissatisfied are just about 20 percent.

In conclusion, after the refurbishment of museum, the number of people who visit Ashdown Museum is increased, and the satisfaction of people is increased too. By this numbers, the refurbishment seems succeed.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount of visitors before refurbishment. The charts of satisfaction is interesti...
^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...shment. The charts of satisfaction is interesting. At the first chart, the pr...
^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sfaction of people is increased too. By this numbers, the refurbishment seems succee...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4756097561 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26339731666 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506097560976 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5372716855 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8333333333 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270737178256 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968011469901 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882432147916 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166097618482 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0964327169431 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.