The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffe and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countreis.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffe and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countreis.

There are two tables show sales of coffee and bananas in the year 1999 and 2004. According to these tables total amount of sales was increased in both items.

In the first table, we can see every country's sales increased. Especially sales amount in UK is outstanding. It increased about 10 times more during 5 years. As result, the rank was changed. In 1999, the figure for sales was highest in Denmark, however, in 2004, UK overwhelmed Denmark. the gap between UK and Denmark is almost 14 millions of euros.

However, the number of sales of banana is quite different with coffee. Except Sweden and Denmark sales of banana was increased in every country. These two countries, Sweden and Denmark, are special case, in there amount of sold banana decreased in half. However in increased countries, the amount of sales is much than coffee. In Switzerland, UK and Belgium, the figure has increased at least three times when comparing 1999 with 2004.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...wever, in 2004, UK overwhelmed Denmark. the gap between UK and Denmark is almost 14...
^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '14 million'.
Suggestion: 14 million
...he gap between UK and Denmark is almost 14 millions of euros. However, the number of sales...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...mount of sold banana decreased in half. However in increased countries, the amount of s...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87654320988 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45598348939 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0298345311 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.7692307692 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4615384615 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.46153846154 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196913542679 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774849865969 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067804405577 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160464734022 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562421679629 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.