Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Information has become the most important source of power recently. Sharing these data has increasingly been demanded in all life's aspects. Many people believed that the accessibility to information is one of the human rights to learn, whereas others think that the important one should be under surveillance. My opinion is that important one should not be shared freely.
Information is a key factor of all technological advances in this era. Because of sharing data, more people would be able to increase their knowledge. Awareness of updated events in various categories whether they are scientific or theoretical will enhance the wheel of progress in both of those. If there are restrictions on this data, many intelligent people could not comprehend the relevant information, and the world will be deprived from their inputs. Thus, sharing information is not an option, furthermore, officials and governments should guarantee the accessibility to information as possible as they can.
On the other hand, sharing valuable information might be disastrous. If there is publicizing of crucial data, no one could predict that it would be in the right direction. As a result, officials should supervise the transfer of it. Moreover, governments should put the necessary legislations in order to make sure that there will be no misuse of the information. We could see how sharing of the critical data has started a threat to the global peace. For instance, transferring the relevant information about nuclear weapons to irresponsible countries has enabled them to have forbidden nuclear weapons, which threatens whole world. Hence, applying restrictions to information-sharing behavior is the only guarantee to prevent further issues.
Finally, although it is extremely vital to share much information to coup up with scientific updates and to maximize number of educated people, valuable data will be highly dangerous if the wrong persons have acquired it. Legislation and obvious rules to control this process is an essence to correct any violations that could be happened.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4475308642 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09979048267 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2704655528 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291616622768 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922283421534 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662159843465 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18101986332 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447391279972 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.