The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals, of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
This graph illustrates consumption of certain bad nutrients factors in each meal.
Overall, snacks has had the highest percentage of consumed sugar. Whereas the dinner meal has contained the highest percentage of Sodium and saturated fat respectively.
Looking for diurnal meal figures. The proportion of lunch meal of Sodium, Saturated fat (sf), and sugar is 29%, 26%, and 19% respectively. Moreover, Breakfast meal,which has the lowest proportion values over these meals, consists of Sodium is 14%, while (sf) and sugar are similar values at 16%.
Turning to nocturnal meals we could find that the dinner meal has the highest values of all of those nutritional factors. It's constituents are Sodium, (sf), and sugar are 43%, 37%, 23%.
Finally, the contents of snacks meals are sugar at 42%, sodium at 14%, and (sf) at 21%, which are having maximum value in category of sugar, but approximately much lower values in both sodium and saturated fat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...% respectively. Moreover, Breakfast meal,which has the lowest proportion values over t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, look, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25324675325 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68602073159 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.048865011 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8888888889 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0519525553964 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0234188338054 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217334877173 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0308573731305 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183498794472 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.