Nowadays we could easily find a sea of information which is shared widely on the internet with the click of a mouse. However, whether information relevant to various of scientific research, business and educational world should be shared as much as we can or there is some information that is too precious to provide willingly and readily has caused heated debate. My view is that it should only be shared freely in particular circumstances.
First, there is no doubt that sharing data in some cases, especially in business could be dangerous. More specifically, information type such as trade secrets could be used as a means to create an enterprise that offers an advantage over competitors. Indeed, If trade secrets are shared freely, firms risk losing their valuable information when employees are hired by its rivals. For example, in early 2019 Tesla sued Cao for allegedly stealing trade secrets related to Autopilot and bringing them to Chinese EV startup Xiaopeng Motors where Cao is now the head of perception. Despite being shared in a small group of 40 employees, it has caused a great loss for Tesla.
On the other hand, it is often said that sharing information freely in scientific research and educational world benefits society. This is simply because by learning valuable experience and vast knowledge that pioneers have accumulated over the years, the research journey for followers will be shortened a lot since they do not make the same mistakes and thus enabling rapid scientific progression and development. However, it will be very unsafe if some scientific breakthroughs fall into the wrong hands. For instance, He Jiankui - a Chinese scientist - shocked the world in 2018 when he announced that twin girls Lulu and Nana had been born with modified DNA to make them resistant to HIV, which he had managed using a gene-editing tool developed by other scientists. His action broke the laws in China since it’s unethical and it can have unintended consequences for the babies later in life or for future generations.
In conclusion, distribution information without constraint might be useful in certain aspects but can also be harmful. Although some believe people should give as much knowledge as possible, I strongly believe the opposite. People should be careful and safeguard some sensitive information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, no doubt, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19576719577 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87954867193 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60582010582 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6234523627 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359123782764 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116087363013 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858778983879 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216615318478 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737006185459 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.