The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This chart presents the times people in the USA ate fast food in 2003,2006 and 2013. Overall, people tend to eat once a week in these recent years while the percentage of "once or twice a month" changed significant on that time.
In 2003,over 30% of Americans decided to eat once per week, marginally more than the figure than one or two in a month. This shows even more in 2006 by 33%, two times than that.However,things began to changed in 2013 when the results shows the opposite. Fewer people were going to eat once per week, while the chart of that grew up,eventually be the same percentage as the "Once a week" seven years ago.
On the other hand,17% of them ate in several times a week,compared than 13% in a few times on a year.Despite the rapid grew in 2006,these two didn't change over the years.The same as people who ate everyday and never ate, when the status shows no change over the time.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XMA3QqZSXQM/V2pSDcd8f1I/AAAAAAAAC-4/mEwz1WAn6... 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ore in 2006 by 33%, two times than that.However,things began to changed in 2013 when th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , things
...2006 by 33%, two times than that.However,things began to changed in 2013 when the resul...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , eventually
...er week, while the chart of that grew up,eventually be the same percentage as the 'Onc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , compared
...,17% of them ate in several times a week,compared than 13% in a few times on a year.Despi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Despite
...pared than 13% in a few times on a year.Despite the rapid grew in 2006,these two didnt ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...espite the rapid grew in 2006,these two didnt change over the years.The same as peopl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...6,these two didnt change over the years.The same as people who ate everyday and nev...
^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...er the years.The same as people who ate everyday and never ate, when the status shows no...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59638554217 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75627920341 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7854147941 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.