The graph below illustrates information about frequency of Americans eating at fast food outlets during a 10-year period. Overall, it is clear that in 2003 and 2006, America people used to consume junk food once a week, while in 2013, Americans used to at fast food once or twice a month.
In 2003 and 2006, Americans have the same period order in eating junk food, where they mostly consumed it once a week, at around 32% in 2003 and approximately 33% in 2006. Following once a week was once or twice a month, with the amount of approximately 30% in 2003 and near 25% in 2006. The next period was several times a week, where there were big percentage differences with the previous period, made it stood at around 17% in 2003 and about 20% in 2006. The last three time frames were a few times a year, never, and every day, with the percentage amount ranging from approximately 4% to 15%.
Meanwhile in 2013, most America people used to had fast food as their meals once or twice a month, at approximately 33%. The period was then followed by once a week, at around 27%. However, there were big percentage disparities with the next periods, in almost 23%. Several times a week frequency stood at around 17%, where it then followed by a few times a year period in a slightly different amount, at about 15%. The least time used by Americans to consume fast food were never, at approximately 4% and every day, at around 2%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...anging from approximately 4% to 15%. Meanwhile in 2013, most America people used to ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52713178295 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4797600253 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437984496124 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0759967385 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0999299914611 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049753238753 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425650755794 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090998168011 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422923818489 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.