The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar charts illustrates the percentage of people who ate fast food in USA restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Most noticeably of all, it can be seen that the percentage of people who ate fast food everyday was lower in all 3 years either 4% in 2003 than it declined and remained constant in both 2006 and 2013 with 3%. So on, about 17% people ate fast food several times a week in 2003 than percentage level went up and slumped to nearly 16% in 2013. In contrast, the percentage of people who ate restaurant food once a week and once or twice a month was higher comparison to all time in 2006 and 2013 respectively and surprisingly, the percentage of people seems relatively constant with 33% whilst in 2013 the percentage of people serving once a week plummeted to 27%.
similarly, the proportion of people who served restaurants food few times a year was 12% in 2003 than remained stable in both 2006 and 2013 at 15%. Consequently, the people who never ate in restaurants pattern was similar to people who ate everyday but percentage was higher in comparison; 5% in 2003 than went down and remained equal at 3% in both 2006 and 2013.
To sum up, the percentage of people who ate once a week and once or twice a month was higher while people who ate everyday were least.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar charts illustrates the percentage of people who ate fast f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... percentage of people who ate fast food everyday was lower in all 3 years either 4% in 2...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...ving once a week plummeted to 27%. similarly, the proportion of people who served re...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...s pattern was similar to people who ate everyday but percentage was higher in comparison...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 115, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...a month was higher while people who ate everyday were least.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, similarly, so, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5364806867 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59072517144 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429184549356 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2876857461 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2857142857 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335083207004 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228491945159 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137732848301 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285809915734 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165530123262 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.