The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in USA since 1980 with projections unitl 2030.
The line graph illustrates the US energy consumption by fuel since 1980 with future projection until 2030.
Most noticeably of all, it can be seen that from 1980 to 2015 maximum energy ws consumed through petrol and oil about (35 quadrillion unit and 42 quadrillion unit respectively). Though until 1995 there was fluctuation than it followed upward trend;however, it is predicted that it will hike to 47 quadrillion unit in 2030.while the least energy was derived from hydropower, followed by Solar/Wind and Nuclear. Until 1985, energy used from all these three source was relatively constant at 3qd than in present energy consumed through nuclear and solar/wind went up to 7qd unit and 4qd unit respectively ;however, it is predicted to hike in 2030, reaching 7qd unit and 5 qd unit respectively. Whilst the energy consumption from hydropower has fallen back to 1980;3qd and predicted to stay stable in 2030.
In 1980 about 20qd unit and 17qd unit energy was consumed from natural gas and coal respectively but energy used through natural gas slumped while coal increased, remained same between 1985 to 1990 than both fluctuated rising up and stay equal in present at 24qd unit. In 2030 it is predicted that energy consumption from coal will hike drastically to 28qd, whereas natural gas will be at same quadrillion unit as present in 2030.
To sum up, USA energy consumption is increasing rapidly and will hike in future. It may result in the limitation of fossil fuel for upcoming generation
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 71, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ion is increasing rapidly and will hike in future. It may result in the limitation of fos...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06024096386 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80773734128 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522088353414 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2418323364 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238575198513 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129695452868 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953499473393 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184033738225 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100079952803 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.