The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restauranta between 2003 and 2013
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make camparisons where relevent.
The given bar graph illustrates the percentage of people eating fast food often at regular intervals in three years that is 2003, 2006 and 2013.
It is clear that the people who ate fast food every day were very less in all three years that is 2003, 2006 and 2013 ( less than 5% ) similarly, the people who never ate fast food also did not increase than 5%. Furthermore, the citizens of the USA who ate fast food several times a week increased to 20% in 2006,17% in 2003 and 16% in 2013.
Moving ahead, masses who ate once a week were 31% in 2003, 33% in 2006 and 27% in 2013. Moreover, people who ate junk fast food twice or once a month were 30% in 2003, 25% in 2006, and 34% in 2013. But there were very fewer people who ate few times a year that is 13% in 2003, 15% in 2006 and 2013.
To close, it can be seen that there were very fewer people who ate every day and who did not consume fast food at all but the people who ate once a week or once-twice a month were very high in number.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... three years that is 2003, 2006 and 2013 less than 5% similarly, the people who ...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat is 2003, 2006 and 2013 less than 5% similarly, the people who never ate fast...
^^
Line 13, column 186, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: high
... a week or once-twice a month were very high in number.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, moreover, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.05555555556 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.86508662194 2.65546596893 70% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5091139486 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182610748967 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118059842582 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348972801031 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13404984775 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356405195592 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.36 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.56 11.4140731707 57% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.