The chart below shows the expenditure of two
Companies on consume goods in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five consumer goods (cars, computers, books, perfume, and cameras) in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling
Overall, the UK spent more money on
consumer goods than France in the period given. Both the British and the Frenchs spent most of their money on cars whereas the least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. Furthermore, the most significant difference in expenditure between the two countries was on cameras.
In terms of cars, people in the UK spent
about 450,000 on this as opposed to the French at £400,000. Similarly, the British expenditure was higher on books than the French (around £400,000 and £300,000 ). In the UK, expenditure on cameras just over £350,000) was over double that of France, which was only £150,000.
On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods was higher in France. Above £350,000 was spent by the French on computers which were slightly more than the British who spent exactly £350,000. Neither of the countries spent much on perfume which accounted for £200,000 of expenditure in France but under £150,000 in the UK.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consumer
... Overall, the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France in the period given. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: About
...terms of cars, people in the UK spent about 450,000 on this as opposed to the Frenc...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 160, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the French around £400,000 and £300,000 . In the UK, expenditure on cameras just ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, similarly, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 205.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98536585366 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54572659837 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492682926829 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.1898560637 44.8134815571 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.2 76.5299724578 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 16.8248392259 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 4.34317383033 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.29896907216 140% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701063972432 0.216113520407 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394947477231 0.0766984524023 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395714115336 0.0603063233224 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0412423409266 0.12726935374 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419454678922 0.0580467560999 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 7.59969072165 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 41.2886597938 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.