The line graphs show wheat exports in Australia, Canada and European Community.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given linear graph chart illustrates the information regarding three countries namely, Australia, Canada and Europe. The wheat was exported from these countries for over a decade. The data has been calibrated in millions of tons.
The graph shows that the tons of wheat which was exported from Canada increased significantly, like a mountain, whereas their was a steep drop in the exports of Australia.
After having a quick glance, it is apparent that the maximum wheat floor which was exported from Canada during 1986 to 1988 increased suddenly from 16 tons to 25 tons. However, the most dramatic export had been observed in the whole years when the floor, which was exported from European community climbed dramatically by 4 tons.
Turning towards the remaining of the information is that, in the last two year floor exported from Canada plummeted by 1 ton more than one in ten in the period of one year, that is from 1988 to 1989. From 1998 to 1990 the one twenty wheat was exported from European community.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...from these countries for over a decade. The data has been calibrated in millions of...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...en calibrated in millions of tons. The graph shows that the tons of wheat whic...
^^^
Line 13, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 1989. From 1998 to 1990 the one twenty wheat was exported from European communi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97687861272 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58631604913 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57225433526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9585628109 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197635347933 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999842727421 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581192411478 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141645654465 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385787841893 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.