The graph below shows the quantities of goods exported to several countries between 1975 and 2010 by different modes of transport.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph depicts tonnes of goods exported from Russia via different transport channels over a period of 35 years.
it is visible from the graph that waterways were the mode of choice in 1975 with 90 million tonnes transported through their channels. There was some fluctuation in the following 10 years and then the tonnage of goods sent via water increased steadily and reached a peak of 130 million tonnes in 2010. The second most preferred method was road, which showed a smart rise in the first 10 years and rose from 60 million tonnes to 80 million tonnes. However, it then stagnated and declined to less than 70 in 2005, followed by a steep rise to 85 million tonnes in 2010
50 million tonnes of goods were transported by railways in 1975, which declined gradually and reached 30 m tonnes in 1995 and then picked up to nearly 60 m tonnes in 2010. With the smallest figure of 18 million tonnes in 1975, the least preferred mode was the air that almost doubled in 2000, followed by a sharp dip in 2005; then it further rose to a peak of 40 million tonnes in 2010.
Finally, the graph reveals that the overall export of Russia has increased in the given period. However, their preferences for modes of exporting goods remained the same with waterways as the first choice and air as the last one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...hannels over a period of 35 years. it is visible from the graph that waterway...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61440677966 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34037587491 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504237288136 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6217242287 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.125 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141514063457 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781370695521 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366874626793 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10765089981 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257352624827 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.