The bar chart provides information about how often American people visits restaurants to eat fast food in the years 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of people, who went to fast food restaurant once a week, were highest in 2003 and 2006, while in 2013 those who visited the restaurants once or twice a month were highest.
To comments with, in 2003, 31% of the Americans ate the food outside once in a week. Then, this figure hitted the peak of of approximately 33% in 2006 and then it reduced to below 30%. People of the USA who consumed fast food once or twice in a month were 30% in 2003, then it reduced to 25% in 2006 and again rose and hit the peak of 33%.
Furthermore, in 2003, 2006 and 2013 around 17%, 20% and 16% of the USA population ate the fast food at restaurants more than once in a week. Apart from that, Americans who prefer to take fast food a few times a year were 14% in 2003 but it remained stable at 15% in both 2006 and 2013. Americans who preffered to take fast food and those who never ate the food at outside had the least number below 5% for all three years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...week. Then, this figure hitted the peak of of approximately 33% in 2006 and then it r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, then, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.21296296296 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17866258166 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49537037037 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.4788669492 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227244571519 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121638101117 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061321044581 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1616348063 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568807260123 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.