The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in the five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the movement of house prices in five major cities from 1990 to 2002 as compared to their average price in 1989. The cities mentioned in the graph were New York, Madrid, Tokyo, Frankfurt, and London and units were measured in percentage.
To illustrate better, the time period was divided into two halves, from 1990 to 1995 and 1996 to 2002. In the first group, growth in house prices was not impressive. Of the five, New York, Tokyo, and London showed depreciation in their home’s monetary value. The latter two cities showed the greatest loss with prices going down to as much as minus 8 percent. Meanwhile, Madrid and Frankfurt, slightly improved their house prices by about 1-2%, respectively. The second group showed a more impressive growth, some performed better than others gaining more than double of what they have lost in the first half. However, Frankfurt’s prices remained at the bottom of the chart with minus 5%.
It is noteworthy to mention that among the cities, New York and London displayed the most considerable movement with having a negative worth during the first half then moving up in the latter half with an increase of more than 5 to 10%. Although Tokyo remained on the negative side of the chart, it has also shown improvement from -8% to -5% at the end of the period.
In summary, house prices in five various cities exhibited an increased in prices at the end of the given period compared to their prices in 1989. Among them, New York and London showed the highest increase in prices with more than doubling their starting value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, then, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85401459854 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47035813094 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529197080292 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0002164809 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.307692308 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272418515505 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112321513654 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10100701805 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18305979406 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086132294472 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.