The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned bar graph illustrates the comparison between the data about the variation occurred in prices of houses in five cities namely: Tokyo, London, New York, Madrid and Frankfurt over the period from 1992 to 2002 and 1989.
Overall, as is represented by the graph, changes in price of house in London was dominant, while Tokyo had relatively low ratio of change during 1996 to 2002. However, the scenario was completely different in duration of 1990 to 1995, where Frankfurt had the highest ratio, whereas exactly same variation can be noticed in London as well as Tokyo.
It is evident that in 1990 to 1995 Frankfurt encountered the highest change of nearly 3% whereas, London and Tokyo accounted same proportion approximately 7% of change. Similarly, in Madrid the variation was mere with the figure of around 2%, but in New York the price declined by 5%.
However, between 1996-2002 the price of houses in New York considerably increased and had the change of 5% . Similarly, largest change was observed in London, which accounted more than 10 % of hike in price. But, the houses in Frankfurt were comparatively cheaper with the change of nearly 3%. Moreover, the value of houses in Tokyo was the lowest one and had decrement of 5% in average price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: different
...2. However, the scenario was completely different in duration of 1990 to 1995, where Frankfurt had th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rably increased and had the change of 5% . Similarly, largest change was observed ...
^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the largest'.
Suggestion: , the largest
...sed and had the change of 5% . Similarly, largest change was observed in London, which ac...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96713615023 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64305574009 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4710184476 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261355264549 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124378303758 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623451291569 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167949633072 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743511341023 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.