The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned bar graph illustrates the data about the proportion of people according to age group who provided financial support to charity in years 1990 and 2010 in United Kingdom.
Overall, as is represented by the bar graph, age group of 36-50 were dominant whereas youths of age group 18-25 donated relatively low amount of money during 1990. However 51-65 group contributed significantly higher amount while 18-25 granted considerably low figure of money to charity in 2010.
It is evident that approximately 42% of charity funds was donated by age group of 36-50 in contrast 18-25 age range accounted subsequently low amount of nearly 17% only which was the lowest during 1990. But, age of 51-65 had the rate of exactly 35% which was followed by 65+ with figure of around 32%. In addition to this, 26-35 group contributed more than 30%.
However, the scenario was completely different during in 2010. During this time, 15-65 group accounted the highest percentage around 40% but 18-25 donates significantly low rate just around 6% . Likewise, the ratio of 65+ rose gradually from 32% to exactly 35% while rate of 26-35 dropped moderately and reached around 27%. Moreover, the figure of 36-50 decreased gradually by 7% and had figure of 35%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...tively low amount of money during 1990. However 51-65 group contributed significantly h...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...es significantly low rate just around 6% . Likewise, the ratio of 65+ rose gradual...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, moreover, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06763285024 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61923059274 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8577634976 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104247126377 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453745451529 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441267798907 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080431893965 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416579150449 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.