The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
the chart illustrates how many males and females educated in the future in Britain in three different years and being studied full-time or part-time
overall, there was a minimal downward trend in the number of males studying part-time while the figure for females increased significantly. The number of both genders who engaged in full-time education climbed
in 1970, about 1000 thousand men were found in part-time education compared to nearly 800 thousand women. From 1970 to 1990 the US witnessed a slight decrease of around 50 thousand people in the number of males being studied part-time in 1990. By contrast, the number of women in this education rose substantially to just under 1200 thousand people and this figure took over that of men
in terms of full-time eduction, in 1970 approximately 100 thousand men in Britain being studied full-time, which was about twice as much as that of women. However, in 1970, the figure for females excessed that of males, at roughly 200 thousand people. By 19990, the number of men and women being studied full-time have grown to over 200 and well-over 210 thousand people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the chart illustrates how many males and fe...
^^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thousand people. By 19990, the number of men and women being studied full-time ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04301075269 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.598571252 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6973441632 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.333333333 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315644940788 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171107766641 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920665918788 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222823592832 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382762045837 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.