Task 2: Some people think that the incresig use of computers and mobile phones in communication has had negative effects on young people’s reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Individuals argue that the frequent use of computers and cell phones in order to communicate can bring more drawbacks on young’s language skills such as reading and writing skills. I totally agree with this idea
It is clear that using computers and mobile phones as a tool of communication have adverse impacts on writing skills of youngsters. As we can see that today’s teenager who use computers and mobile phones to communicate with different peopel can tend to use shorthand and shortened version of the words and phrases in order to faster communication while texting. Therefore, we are likely to develop the habit of applying this kind of language in their writing style, which might impair wiring skills. Secondly, youth could be too much reliant on automatic software such as Microsoft that can correct spelling errors or grammar mistakes. As a result, we may not detect our faults and correct ourselves
I belive that excessive exposure to computers and cell phones have detrimental influences on reading skills as well . It is noticable that youth could prefer to read newspapers about celebrities or haedlines that often contain simple sentences and vocabularies at the basic level. People reading these newspapers frequently can lead to lack of academic lexical resources which are necessary for our higher education in the future. In addition to this, podcasts on computers and cell phones allow people to learn through listening without reading. Thus, if we expose heavily to computers and mobile phones, we will not improve reading skills
In conclusion, I am of the oppinion that there will be negative influences on people’s writing and reading skills if we depend on computers and mobile phones
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tal influences on reading skills as well . It is noticable that youth could prefer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20143884892 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73328924686 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.167948698 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.6 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305156938884 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117978560562 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854786133205 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214509376018 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474926314111 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.