The given bar graph demonstrates the number of British males and females who pursued higher education full time and part-time in the academic year 1970/71, 1980/81, and 1990/91.
Overall, it is noticeable that unlike the number of female students and full-time male students that experienced the increase, those of men who contributed to their further study part-time followed a downward trend with a fluctuation over the given period.
As shown in the chart for females, a notable number of women attended the university for their higher education each increased markedly each period. In 1970, the number of part-time students was marked at around 720 thousand. It grew dramatically to approximately 1150 thousand in 30 years. Likewise, full-time learner's numbers had risen from only 40 thousand to about 200,000 in 1990/91.
However, further education did not tend to be attractive to males. In 1970, it showed approximately 1,000,000 people pursued their further education, while the number decreased to its lowest point in 1980/81 at a little under 900 thousand. However, for the later 10 years, it seemed to be more men doing their further education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...nd females who pursued higher education full time and part-time in the academic year 1970...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...ousand in 30 years. Likewise, full-time learners numbers had risen from only 40 thousand...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33152173913 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7779714672 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7511933208 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250025324035 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986530179597 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595098483358 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157670589278 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427739158398 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.