The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The report aims to provide information about how people in the United Kingdom, represented by genders, pursued their higher education between 1970/71 and 1990/91 concerning the period of their study time.
Generally, it is seen that the number of people who were studying part-time was relatively higher than those who enrolled the full-time education. The majority of a graph experienced an upward trend, while the number of men in the part-time further study followed a downward trend. By the end of the period, female part-time pupils overshadow those of male students.
Focusing on male students, the number stood at 1000 thousand for college students in a part-time class in 1970 and fluctuated during the period. By 1990, its number decreased slightly to approximately 900 thousand. The full-time students, however, tended to show a slight increase from only 100 thousand in 1970/71 to over 200 thousand in 1990/91.
Over the 20 years, it is obvious that women seemed to continue their further education much higher. They showed significant growth in part-time education, reached and outraced those of men in 1990 with over a million students. The full-time study's students also followed a relatively similar path.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34020618557 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7178003084 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3898464074 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31685454981 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127878694402 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470093436968 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191057245785 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618288324983 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.