The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart illustrates the comparison of the the number of males and females who received full-time or part-time education in Britain from 1970 to 1991.
Overall, it is apparent that the number of men and women in the full-time education is higher than the part-time education over the periods given.
Between 1970 and 1971, the number of men who studied full-time was 1 million, which decreased to about 830,000 in 1980/1081, and again rose to approximately 850,000. On the other hand, the number of women in full-time education increased over time, which was about 650,000 at the beginning of the period and peaked at 110,0000 at the end of the period, this number outstripped the number of males.
With regards to part-time education, the number of males increased gradually over there periods, which went up from 100,000 to 200,000. Similar trend also observed in the number of women, the number rose dramatically from about 50,000 to 200,000 between 1970 and 1991.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...The chart illustrates the comparison of the the number of males and females who receive...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...The chart illustrates the comparison of the the number of males and females who receive...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'periods'' or 'period's'?
Suggestion: periods'; period's
...r than the part-time education over the periods given. Between 1970 and 1971, the nu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07453416149 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60910969799 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509316770186 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5459883344 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.166666667 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296685894496 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18325440691 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102641312439 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233052573866 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928203958145 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.