The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.

The bar charts compare the gender balance of students who participated in course of further enlightenment in educational institutions in Britain in three periods. All in all, the data differ significantly.

As shown in the information of male learners, the number of full-time students was in a dominant position in 1970/71, standing at a staggering value of 1,000,000. After having plunged in the subsequent decade, the number rose slight to 900000 in 1990/91. Meanwhile, a gradual growth in number of part-time student had sustained over two decades resulting 200000 men was witnessed in this mode in 1990/91, which is one quarter of its full-time counterparts.

Evidently, among the two types of courses picked by women, both witnessed an increase over the 20-year period. Increased from some 700000 to 800000 in 1980/91, the number of female learners in full-time education surged to over 1000000 in 1990/91. Likewise, with a considerable growth, part-time education saw a rise to 200000 in 1980/81, which is practically identical to the figure in the subsequent decade.

Overall, at the time these data were recorded, the portion of full-time students was invariably outnumbering its part-time counterparts.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, while, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46560846561 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09585757831 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613756613757 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3223322469 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321604633238 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115745813639 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732924320306 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184860529344 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434331805385 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.