Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
Over the past decades, the conventional form of teaching entailing reading and writing has translated to a more entertaining approach around the globe. Alongside the changing pattern, the latest sociological discoveries have casted light on the desired outcomes of this shift in terms of fostering skill development and encouraging creativity of junior learners. The aim of this essay is set to explore these benefits to contend that enjoyable curriculum is auspicious for children.
To begin with, undergoing entertainment on learning is widely perceived as a stimulus for better understanding. What this means is that children who participate in these entertaining activities can gain an opportunity to practically employ the skill learnt, which in turns foster the enlightenment comprehensively. For instance, a recent empirical research from the English Speaking Society established that 90% students who joined English drama can acquire the correct pronunciation of a range of vocabularies in shorter time than their counterparts immersing in studies mainly encompassing reading and writing. Consistent with this line of thinking, the experience derived from these enjoyable activities, to a considerable extent, could intensify the memory relating to the scope of teaching.
Meanwhile, another positive consequence is that enlightening by enjoyable elements could foster the development of creativity. This is because the challenge involved in these components often necessitate creativity to resolve. An archetype could be found in having a typical field trip rather than a biological lesson indoor. In fact, students who are planning an expedition in countryside probably warrant an estimation and assessment on possible risk, which then present them a chance to create a strategy prior to encountering the matter. Consequently, the preparation of these enjoyable activities often constitute a positive driver of innovation.
In conclusion, there is ample evidence suggested that enjoyable activities have a vitally important role to play in junior education regarding facilitating skill acquisition as well as driving the utilisation of creativity compared with reading. Given the strength of this evidence, it is predicted that more enjoyable components will be incorporated in academic activities in foreseeable future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent empirical research'.
Suggestion: recent empirical research
...htenment comprehensively. For instance, a recent empirical research from the English Speaking Society estab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, regarding, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in short, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88235294118 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30865489766 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614705882353 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.137163287 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.857142857 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199193133864 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615634816166 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303564526114 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114429124226 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298560245215 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.