A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
You should write at least 250 words.
Critics throughout the city have debated whether the company should money on arts or projects that directly connected to environmental protection. In spite of the potential earnings on artistic investment, the ensuing benefits of environmental protection is now becoming increasingly concerned by the stakeholders. This essay will analyse both views and use the examples from Hong Kong to demonstrate points.
To begin with, investing on artistic facilities is intuitively perceived as a profitable business. The central reason behind this stems from the fact that arts is growing in importance. In fact, the majority of visitors of art galleries and museums admitted that their productivity enormously recovered after a monthly visit to these buildings. Moreover, it must not be forgotten that the art pieces installed in art galleries or museums can inspire innovation for various business sectors. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that arts, to a considerable extent, is worth investing regarding its business potential.
Although there is a case for art galleries or museums translating into a promising business, the ensuing improvement of living quality begot by supporting environmental protection cannot be neglected. This is largely because the urban sprawling and industrialisation has led to massive pollution, which in turn casted detrimental effects to our health. For instance, the Environment Committee established that there has been evidently a surge in percentage of air pollutants at the road side since 2000. Consistent with this line of thinking is that the incidences of lung cancer could have declined significantly if more trees were planted on streets to counteract the pollution given by growing population. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that investing environmental friendly campaign such as greening the residential area increases the likelihood on gaining acceptance from the public.
In conclusion, supporting artistic development could generate a significant amount of revenue, yet the investment on environmental protection that enriching the well-being of our descendants are by far more essential to a metropolitan city. Given the increasing awareness of public health, it is predicted that the company will choose to spend money on environmental protection.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71884057971 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27421295725 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617391304348 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8910756871 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.533333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172989861683 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504376557611 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473544457667 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105225014497 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445050655259 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.