The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below.
The series of pie charts reveal the changing pattern of budget that was spent by general families on restaurants from 1970 to 2000, whereas the comparison of the popularity of fast food and sit-down restaurant over the same period was manifested in the line graph.
As shown from the information provided, the percentage of budget for dining in restaurant by an average family significantly increased over the three decades. Standing at 10% and 15% in 1970 and 1980 respectively, the ratio of dining outside saw an approximately tripled rise in 80's. In 2000, the money spent on eating out was at the same level of that of home cooking.
Regarding the demands over two types of catering service providers, the popularity of both fast food shop and sit-down restaurant registered a remarkable growth over the 40-year period. In spite of the identical figure of 20 meals per year in 1970, sit-down restaurant gained its prevalence up to 50 meals per year in 2000, while the surge from 1980 ensured the staggering growth of fast food meals overtook its counterpart in 1990, demonstrating a quadrupled influence to the public in 2000.
Overall, the fast food had grown in importance over this period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'chart'.
Suggestion: chart
The series of pie charts reveal the changing pattern of budget t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01492537313 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80205965823 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0453527432 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283045324198 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118693304751 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802961395533 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161074543151 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662175888734 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.