The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants.
Summarie the information and write at least 150 words.
The pie charts depict the information about the proportion of food budget spent by average family on restaurant cuisines over past decades from 1970-2000. The line graph illustrates the trend in figures of meals consumed in junk food and sit-down restaurants over the period.
Overall, the number of meals consumed in junk food restaurants witnessed a drastic growth, whereas, the proportion of home cooking reduced over the years.
In the year 1970, the home-made cuisines accounted for the majority proportion where the money spent on restaurant meals was just 10% of the total. But with the passage of time, the proportion of home cooking experienced gradual drop and reduced to half of the total consumption on meals with an equivalent restaurant meal budget proportion in 2000.
Furthermore, the meals consumed in fast food and sit-down restaurants were observed to be equal in 1970. Forth then, both witnessed an increment in the figures. While fast food meals grew significantly, the sit-down restaurant meals trended steadily. By the year 2000, junk food achieved the mark of 90 meals per year, whereas, sit-down meals were low at around 50 meals per year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24338624339 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72539677404 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534391534392 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1841440384 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391951422506 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185266565089 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919005479891 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247151558436 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807758305873 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.