The graphic shows the what kind of meals the families preferred to eat and how much they spent over them. Budget spending for two types of food – home cooked and restaurant meals are compared for every 10 years since 1970. Further, insights are provided for two types of non-home cooked foods – fast food and sit down meals.
In the year 1970, a significant portion of the food budget for households was spent on home cooked meals as compared to a meagre 10% on hotel dishes. This number, however, grows gradually over the years reaching 35% in the year 1990. A year into the new millennium and the modern families spent for home cooked and restaurant meals in equal portions.
In order to compare what choices families spent their budget in a restaurant on, the food is divided into two categories, namely, fast food and sitdown restaurants. The line chart is used to compare the consumption in meals per year. The sitdown restaurants were chosen to eat meals over fast foods till the year 1983-84. Following which, the locals began to prefer fast food. Hence, the fast food meals served per year skyrocketed since then and continued to do so till the year 2000.
However, the number of meals/year in increased for both types, regardless, from 1970 to 2000. This trend correlates with the data observed from the budget spending pie-charts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85344827586 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39721833944 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525862068966 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2447335066 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6153846154 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305108974354 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122815969809 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615703844792 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187495646354 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836533108532 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.