The execution of capital punishment to the criminals keeps the number of murderers the same in society. This paradoxical situation can only be avoided if they are given life sentences. But do they really deserve to live after committing such heinous crimes!
Countries like Norway and The Netherlands believe in prisons to reform i.e. the guilty steps into the jail to change himself for better. The prisoners are made to understand the seriousness of their crimes and molded into better humans. This, however, works only for few societies. On the contrary, there are also countries like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia where the rapists are stoned to death in public.
A school of thought is that the death penalty is the easy way out for them. The guilty should not be let off so easy and instead, be allowed to live with the crimes committed and serve penance with hardships every single day for the rest of their lives. On the other hand, some organizations iterate it is better to get rid of them instead of letting them have free food and accommodation funded by the taxpayer’s money.
I believe the law has been brought for fearmongering among the anti-social elements. Its simple math, more serious the crime, harder the punishment for it. Such laws discourage people from taking extreme measures and teach the value of life and the importance of the living.
One can still argue that the death penalty has been on since the ancient times when the Kings used to get their subjects executed and yet the atrocities of criminals haven’t stopped. The convicts are still audacious to take lives. However, I think we should also take the circumstances and the motive into consideration on a case by case basis before handing out death sentences. That said, If the crime is devious, the person should be executed. The world will be a better place without them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, still, i think, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91222570533 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60103850095 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592476489028 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6388845199 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1764705882 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20208687305 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528724075917 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421275993786 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995480279686 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324887030129 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.