The bar chart gives information about the quantity of telephone (in billion minutes) calls made in the United Kingdom during the period 1995-2002. The source of calls can be used to divide them into three categories – local – fixed line, national and international calls – fixed line and mobile calls.
The local landline calls dominate the scene during the year 1995 with over 70 billion minutes of calls made as compared to 35 billion minutes of national and international calls. The mobile based calls were significantly low (3-4 billion minutes) in the year 1995 which could be attributed to the mobile phones being relatively new and expensive technology.
The numbers, however, change as one can observe steady growth in the mobile phone usage from under 5 billion in 1995 to 45 billion minutes in the year 2002. Even though the mobile users increase, the fixed line local calls also exhibited a decent rise hitting the pinnacle (90 billion minutes) in the year 1999 and followed by a gradual decrease thereon, to 70 billion minutes in the year 2002. Interestingly, the fixed line remained a stable choice for users to make national and international calls throughout the period with a small increment every year in the volume of calls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...tion about the quantity of telephone in billion minutes calls made in the United Kingdo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...calls – fixed line and mobile calls. The local landline calls dominate the scene...
^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es of national and international calls. The mobile based calls were significantly l...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tively new and expensive technology. The numbers, however, change as one can obs...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98564593301 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56232492697 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.3742020665 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.857142857 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290890316325 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15183402682 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685996154931 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219957238903 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452590810055 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.