It has been a general notion that a child should be allowed to make their own choices and be more independent. This, however, does not goes well with a section of people who believe they will become selfish and disregard other’s wellbeing and wishes for their own.
Looking at the merits of letting kids make their own choices in everyday tasks includes them being more organized and proactive. The kids should be held responsible for the choices he makes which will make them more sensitive and responsive towards others. Letting make their own choices also makes a child more involved in a decision making process which will develop his problem solving skills.
Another school of thought is how the children who are allowed to make their own choices grow up to become more self-centred. In the places like supermarkets, a child will pick their favourite food or a video game. Those choices would probably be dictated by the common trends they have been exposed to on the social media and television programming. They will disregard other’s safety and pick the most violent videogame off the shelf just cause it’s mass advertised or not age appropriate.
The author believes every child deserves a right to make their own choices but they are needed to be educated first the consequences of the said choices. They should be taught how the choices they make will affect the people around them. That being said, as long as there is an adult by their side, the kids should be allowed to choose, make mistakes, learn and repeat the whole process all over again.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...re independent. This, however, does not goes well with a section of people who belie...
^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...t how the choices they make will affect the people around them. That being said, as long as there is a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91417910448 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46610741605 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8276000093 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.75 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28565861915 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125126643464 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703880171683 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198967113724 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408591649761 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.