The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The chart depicts the time spent on three different types of telephone calls in the UK between 1995 and 2002.The minutes were measured in billion.
Overall, local fixed line calls were the highest throughout the period. Although, there been some fluctuations. From 1995 to 2002, National and international fixed line calls and mobile calls had the similar figure, but mobile calls were experiencing very slow increase between 1995 to 1999.
It can be seen that, between 1995 and 2002, the majority of people had been called through local fixed line calls. Rising from 70 billion minutes in 1995 to just under 90 minutes in 1998. After peaking at 90 billion in the following year (1999), these calls were falling and hit to the 1995 figure by 2002 (70 minutes).
Moving to the national and international fixed line calls, in 1995, approximately 38 billion minutes spent but this trend was steadily went up to 60 billion minutes in 2002. Even though, 2001 and 2002 had almost equal numbers (60 billion).
In addition, there was a dramatic increase in mobile calls, just over 2 billion in 1995 to considerably under 50 minutes in 2002. This rise was particularly noticeable from 1999 to 2002, during this time the usage of mobile calls tripled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e calls in the UK between 1995 and 2002.The minutes were measured in billion. Ov...
^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...5 and 2002.The minutes were measured in billion. Overall, local fixed line calls wer...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...were the highest throughout the period. Although, there been some fluctuations. From 199...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r 1999, these calls were falling and hit to the 1995 figure by 2002 70 minutes. ...
^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... under 50 minutes in 2002. This rise was particularly noticeable from 1999 to 200...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94285714286 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47103859663 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6177990813 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3636363636 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346186901001 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141623226239 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875071813697 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218901569527 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704821014768 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.