The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

The graph below presents information about the number of phone calls time splitted on the three groups depending on their types (regional, national and international and cellular) from 1995 and till 2002. Units are measured in billions of minutes.
At the first glance, it is clear that most calls were local-fixed line ones, while the fewest calls were made via mobile network. The same situation is observed throughout the period in question. However, in 1999 the highest number of local calls were made and in 1995, there was the smallest quantity of cellular phone calls
As far as local calls are concerned, we can see that at first number of calls gradually rose from around 70 billion in 1995 to 90 billion in 1999, and then the figures returned at the same pace to the equal value in 2002. Speaking about national and international phone conversations, there was an upward trend over the period from approximately 36 billion minutes in 1995 to 61 billion in 2002.There is the upward trend also regards to mobile phone calls. The rate goes up almost exponentially from 3 billion in the beginning of concerned period and to nearly 45 billion of messages in the end of it.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mallest quantity of cellular phone calls As far as local calls are concerned, we ...
^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...n minutes in 1995 to 61 billion in 2002.There is the upward trend also regards to mob...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, then, while, speaking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81280788177 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59448358918 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.7869279958 43.030603864 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281549702839 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113411932006 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772676339576 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191898955102 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608925451106 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.