The graph below presents information about the amount of phone calls time spitted on the three groups depending on calls types (regional, national and international and cellular calls) from 1995 and till 2002. Units are measured in billions of minutes.
Overall, the most of the calls were inside the local territory units, while the least calls were made via mobile network. The same situation is observed in every year. Although in 1999, the most number of local calls were made and in 1995, there was the least quantity of calls through cellular phones.
As far as local calls are concerned, we can see that at first number of calls gradually rose from around 70 billion in 1995 to 90 billion in 1999, and then the figures returned at the same pace to the equal value in 2002. Speaking about national and international phone conversations, there was an upward trend over the period from approximately 36 billion minutes in 1995 to 61 billion in 2002. There is the uplift also regards to mobile phone calls. The rate goes up almost exponentially from 3 billion in the beginning of concerned period and to nearly 45 billion of messages in the end of it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, while, speaking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75621890547 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49771064207 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9955631178 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295035577198 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106527036869 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784420849298 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196290964603 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647010362502 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.