The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2010.
The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2010.
Answer:
The graph depicts the proportion of men and women who taught in seven different faculties of a particular university in 2010.
Overall, in business, engineering, law and science academics males minority was higher whereas in arts and education faculties occupied by females. Although, medicine faculty had almost equal percentage by both genders. However, there was a large gender disparity in some faculties.
It can be seen that, engineering academic was dominated by male, approximately more than 80% . whilst education had three quarters more women, more or less 75%. Notably, business and science academics were had the same proportion by males and females ( marginally over 60% and well under 40% respectively).
In arts academic women staffs had slightly more percentage while in law men crossed by nearly 20% more compared to women (around 58% ladies staff and 60% gents staff respectively). It was interesting that in medicine both genders representation was almost equal (approximately 50%). However, engineering academic had significantly higher percentage, over 80% by males. And in education below 80% by females. In other faculties,there was variation in both genders representation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ted by male, approximately more than 80% . whilst education had three quarters mor...
^^
Line 10, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
... by male, approximately more than 80% . whilst education had three quarters more women...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...education had three quarters more women, more or less 75%. Notably, business and ...
^^
Line 10, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the same proportion by males and females marginally over 60% and well under 40% r...
^^
Line 12, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more percentage while in law men crossed by nearly 20% more compared to women aro...
^^
Line 12, column 424, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...below 80% by females. In other faculties,there was variation in both genders represent...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, whereas, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61083743842 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09243023522 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8100519553 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6153846154 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363354599834 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13676723689 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.256181829614 0.0843802449381 304% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30547713367 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.348453121542 0.0819641961636 425% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.