The given histogram highlights the information about tge number of minutesof telephone calls in the UK which are differentiated into three distinct categories between the year: 1995 to 2002. The data is calibrated in billions.
It can be seen that approximately 72 billion minutes were recorded in the local category of calls whereas, National and international calls showed only 38 billion minutes in the year 1995. The figure of local calls had been gradually inclined and reached to the peak with 90 billion minutes in the year 1999. After that, it experienced the declined trend.
As far as trend was concerned, there was a minor difference between the all mobile calls until the year 1990 and this trend did not even reached above a half billion minutes. With regards the number of minutes of all mobile calls, the number of National and international minutes were comparatively high. Moreover, the number of minutes of national and international calls in the years: 2001 and 2002 were nearly 40 billion and 47 billion respectively.
Overall, it is evident that all the types of calls had followed an increasing trend over the given period except local calls because it was dropped within the last three years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'reach'
Suggestion: reach
...e year 1990 and this trend did not even reached above a half billion minutes. With rega...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03465346535 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72955500807 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559405940594 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1558957819 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307946683413 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119953088423 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934449941048 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181099118503 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625894862616 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.