The chart shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
The chart depicts the post qualifications in terms of the different levels of further education reached by men and women in Australia in 1999. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, skill vocational diploma, postgraduate diploma and master's degree had been shown highest portion by females, while undergraduate diploma and bachelor's degree percentage scored by males, however there were few fluctuations had by both genders.
It is clear that, in Australia in 1999, the skill vocational diploma was being raised significantly by females,which was over 90%, before falling by 20% in postgraduate diploma which was almost equal men in undergraduate diploma (70%). Then about 60% of women studied in master's degree but males 20% less interested in this education winch was 40%.
In contrast, 70% of boys were being qualified more in undergraduate diploma but girls ratio was almost half of this percentage ( around 35%), and in Bachelor's degree just 5% less than men. It is noticeable that, under 10% of the proportion seen by males qualified in skilled vocational diploma.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'shown the highest'.
Suggestion: shown the highest
...ate diploma and masters degree had been shown highest portion by females, while undergraduate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...as being raised significantly by females,which was over 90%, before falling by 20% in ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more in undergraduate diploma but girls ratio was almost half of this percentage...
^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ratio was almost half of this percentage around 35%, and in Bachelors degree just...
^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat, under 10% of the proportion seen by males qualified in skilled vocational di...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31764705882 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95301148264 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2781272802 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146593106067 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885594229047 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150507178798 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127300014059 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156972979521 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.