the chart below shows the different levels of post school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
The provided bar chart compares proportion of men and women in different levels of post school qualifications in Australia. The bar chart was categorized to five groups based on post school qualifications.
It is immediately apparent that skilled vocational diploma was mainly consist of men (90%). On the other hand, women have more share of populations (70%) for undergraduate diploma. Bachelor’s degree was another group which consists of 55% of men and 45% of women.
The remaining groups, both, together would have similar pattern based on gender comparing. In post graduate diploma group, there is 70% men and in the master’s degree group, 60% men.
To wrap it up, there was not absolute priority according to the gender among five groups. Except bachelor’s degree group, others differ imperceptible among amount of male and female who have same group. Skilled vocational diploma group have the most men and in the undergraduate diploma, women had more share than men.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...t skilled vocational diploma was mainly consist of men 90%. On the other hand, women ha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31210191083 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01196445791 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 14.3321317326 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.4 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237333057733 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109902929609 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148115388022 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17062008112 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147291899541 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.