The given piece charts give information on the proportion of the on food, the average family spent on meals eaten in restaurants and meals cooked at home meanwhile the given line graph depicts the number of meals taken in fast-food restaurants and eat-in restaurants between1970 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the budget for the home-cooked meal was higher than that restaurant meals, however, there was a continuous decline over the given period. On the other hand, more people went for fast food meals than sit-down meals in the same given time frame.
According to the pie charts, an average household will budget a greater portion (90%) of their income on home-cooking meals in 1970 but this gradually reduced to about 85% in 1980 and by 1990, about a third of their income is budgeted for restaurants meals which now increased to 50% by the year 2000.
On the other hand, the line graph showed that the number of meals purchased as take-away meals increased drastically, over the given period with a start of 20 meals per year in 1970 to about 85 meals per year in the 30 year period. Similarly, the number of eat- in meals in the restaurants rose slightly from 20 meals per year in 1970 to half as much as the number of take-away meals in the year 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s gradually reduced to about 85% in 1980 and by 1990, about a third of their inco...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65333333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46756740311 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506666666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.107203355 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.5 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36030977968 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195662048864 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099837309194 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232469660758 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101865942418 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.