The given bar chart illustrates how often Americans are in gas food restaurants within a ten year period of 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest proportion of people are in restaurants once a week or once or twice a month and the least percentage of people go to gas food restaurants every day within the given time period.
In 2003, approximately 5% of the people are in the restaurants every day. The percentage of people who are outside their home for !t least once a week is just above 30% while those who ate out just a few times in the year were less than15%. 5% of the population never eat in fast-food restaurants. Similarly, in 2006, less than 5% go out to eat every day while roughly about 32% of people prefer to eat out once a week and less than 5% never went to a fast-food restaurant.
However, six years (2013) down the line, the pattern did not change for everyday goers but the proportion of people who to eat in fast-food restaurants at least once a week dropped significantly to about 27%. Those who go out once or twice a year increased considerably to over 30% compared to the years. Consistently, those who went to the restaurants a few times a year remained constant at 15% since 2006. Furthermore, about 4% never went to any fast-food restaurants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 't the least'.
Suggestion: t the least
... people who are outside their home for !t least once a week is just above 30% while tho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52340425532 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75570604365 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476595744681 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8721372906 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249598847485 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118900395148 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763843970845 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176250980801 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522813569333 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.