Some people believe that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit culture and tourist attraction in a country. To what extent do you agree with this view?
It is a commonly held belief among most of the people that visitors from overseas should be charged more than the native residents when they visit tourist sites in another nation. I, hereby, do not accord with the statement and would scrutinize my viewpoint in the forthcoming discussion.
Tourism is a rapidly growing industry today where historical monuments serve as the bedrock for tourist attraction. Notably, the high prices paid by foreign tourists along with the taxes imposed on the local residents contribute to the state subsidies which is further invested in the maintenance of monuments and other tourist places. Since the locals already pay taxes for the well-being of the tourist sites hence, the foreigners should not be heavily charged for their excursion. As people like to discover and explore different nations and their rich heritage thus, disparity in prices on the basis of nationality might cause sense of discrimination among the visitors. If taken on a large scale, this may lead to bitterness in the cordial relationship between nations which would affect the tourism by reduction in population of overseas visitors.
Moreover, the after effects would not only be limited to the curtailment in tourism but would also affect the funds collected for the development of tourist attractions. Therefore, to combat this issue the government should provide a harmonious environment for the foreign visitors by levelling their ticket fares with the local residents so as to maintain equality. For instance, in Europe majority of the tourist sites offer equal charges for visitors regardless of their nationality which is an asset to their tourism industry and attracts more public.
In conclusion, the preservation of heritage through historical buildings and growth in tourism are mutually reinforcing factors. Therefore, more effort should be made to attract more foreign tourists to boost the economic growth rather than making them pay more than local residents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 340, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...r ticket fares with the local residents so as to maintain equality. For instance, in Eur...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41346153846 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77206163177 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554487179487 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.8738117656 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.75 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299659027098 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105902108277 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919206618654 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1994007845 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526536193963 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.