The pictorial charts demonstrate the food budget which has been spent on restaurant meals and home cooking, and the line graph enumerates the number of meals that were eaten in fast food and sit down restaurants.
It can be clearly observed in the pie charts that initially in 1970, 90% food budget was spent on homemade food, whilst restaurants had only 10% expenditure. Coming to 1980, the restaurants exhibited a slight rise of 5 %, and thereafter, this budget increased to 35% in 1990. Finally, it was similar to homemade food with 50%.
Starting with the line graph, it is interesting to note that in the starting year 1970, the utilization of number of meals was same in both the fast food and sit down meal, and further, the number of meals that were taken in sit down restaurant was higher than the number of fast-food meals during 1980; however, in the following years 1990 and 2000, the number of fast-food meals exhibited a rapid rise as compared to sit down restaurant meals.
Overall, the restaurant was the highest in the spending on food budget as well as in the number of meals throughout the different years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79591836735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56620950322 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 125.402573959 43.030603864 291% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454320124514 0.215688989381 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231384709873 0.103423049105 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137578006911 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313037342014 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923981323881 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.