The claim that animals have rights has been subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals?
should be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
Animal rights are increasingly entering our discussion. While some skeptics may maintain the notion that zoos are hurting animals, there are considerable explanations behind why zoos can help animals. This essay will discuss why zoos are beneficial to species and assert that zoos should not be prohibited.
There are various reasons why animals may get hurt in zoos. For instance, animals may be indulged in zoo by manual feeding and their instinct skills of hunting are eventually lost. Some animals such as tigers and lions do in fact face difficulties on rehabilitating from national parks to the nature. Having said that, the percentage of such occurrences is relatively insignificant.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why zoos can help animals. Some species are targets of illegal hunting and, as a result, these animals are endangered. It is well-known that, by keeping pandas in zoos, scientists have saved these rare mammals in China. Therefore, zoos are intuitively perceived as shelters for endangered species.
Given that zoos have their significance on protecting animals from extinction, in my opinion, zoos should not be banned.
In conclusion, some people may think zoos deter animals from learning life skills, and this violates animal rights, but I believe zoos have important roles to play on protecting wildlife. Therefore, they should not be banned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an help animals. This essay will discuss why zoos are beneficial to species and a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37442922374 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8107016536 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9013892374 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0714285714 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6428571429 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300921426657 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107105741733 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562848232368 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184168289745 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422205491225 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.