As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
Traffic congestion is increasingly entering our areas of lives. While few individuals may suggest to build more roads for the growing number of vehicles, there are few reasons why a better network of public transportation should be taken into consideration. This essay will discuss why we should establish a decent public transportation network.
There are various reasons why the number of roads need to be increased. For instance, the growing population begets a higher frequency of commute and more roads may reduce the time of travel. Many new roads do in fact give access to remote area of residence and industrial sites upon the expansion of cities. While adding new roads may be an easy option, the city council may want to consider other options.
Another school of thought is the benefits given by enhancing the mass transportation system. Urbanisation puts stresses on public transportation and, as a result, pollution in our cities is aggravated. It is well-known that cities that are bundled with complex traffic network are mostly suffered from air pollution. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that improving the public transportation that can help mitigate the pressure without excessive pollutants discharged should be a more environmental-friendly option.
In my opinion, enhancing public transportation is a superior option because of the additional environmental benefits.
In conclusion, this essay highlighted why, instead of constructing more roads, we should renew the design of public transportation towards the concern of urban sprawl.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55833333333 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29518798992 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2624734593 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.615384615 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214228026891 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700967688187 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462337583247 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112498185429 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393992143226 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.