The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.
Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Over the past decades, the emergence of technology such as the Internet and mobile devices has revolutionised the way of enrichment and cultivation. Given the trend of translating from attending lecture in hall into laptop installed at home, some commentators prognosticate that conventional teachers are likely to be rendered obsolete in foreseeable future. However, I would contend that teachers remain crucial in academic realm. This essay is set to elaborate my position.
First of all, the technology, in whatever degree it can evolve, is requiring the assistance from human. Admittedly, with the content already embedded in these learning platforms, the programme can be employed ceaselessly in subsequent decades. However, it is the curriculum itself is perceived as the most vital component of this cutting-edge educational system. The design of such agenda counts on the teaching experience to understand the cognitive ability of particular student, which is highly unlikely to be delegate to machines.
Meanwhile, an equally essential counterparts of cultivation is life enrichment, which in turn makes teacher irreplaceable. Despite the utilisation of leading technology that can keep tracking students' behaviour, disciplinary actions entailing solicitous enquiry and consultation are not purely mechanical works that automation is qualified. The intelligence endowed in such learning platforms, unequivocally, excels in facilitating collaboration and placing enormous materials sequentially for students' revision, yet works other than that still constitutes the onus of traditional teacher with emotional sensation.
In conclusion, I would defend that teachers are indispensable. In the future, institution are lobbied to adopt the technology in a more judicious way that can mitigate the burden encountered by teachers instead of substitute them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97388059701 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33997329123 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664179104478 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4784592827 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145670826492 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416966349513 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328278882229 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844255684797 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358405982963 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.52 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.