You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the distribution of expenses that were paid by a typical family in a nation in the year 1950 and 2010.
As shown in the information registered in 1950, housing was in the dominant position of average household spending, accounting for over two-third. Second was the spending of food, which comprised over one-tenth of the overall expenses, followed by education at 6.6%. By contrast, citizens spent less than 4% for the remaining aspects, including health care, transportation and others.
In a stark contrast, food, however, had become the most enormous proportion at 34% in the overall household spending in 2010. While a significant drop in housing was witnessed, the cost labelling as "other" surged, resulting in a practically identical percentage of 20%. Likewise, citizen had to encounter a four-times growth in transportation fee in 2010.
Overall, the household expenditure was dominated by housing in 1950 , whereas housing, food and transportation comprised the major part in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nditure was dominated by housing in 1950 , whereas housing, food and transportatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5125 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24935559666 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.3527485859 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.25 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142359820925 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602010913609 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424113261653 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091314291928 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188833445835 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.